拔牙位點(diǎn)保存技術(shù)在口腔種植修復(fù)中的效果及安全性研究

打開(kāi)文本圖片集

【摘要】目的：對(duì)口腔種植修復(fù)治療方式進(jìn)行討論。方法：選擇本院在2020年6月—2021年6月收治的90例行口腔種植修復(fù)患者，基于隨機(jī)數(shù)表法平均分組，每組45例。兩組采用不同治療方式，對(duì)兩組患者臨床指標(biāo)、PES評(píng)分和不良事件發(fā)生率進(jìn)行對(duì)比。結(jié)果：治療前，兩組患者牙槽骨高度、牙槽骨寬度和牙槽骨密度相比，差異不具備統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P>0.05），治療后，兩組牙槽骨高度、牙槽骨寬度和牙槽骨密度差異明顯（P0.05），治療后，兩組牙槽骨吸收量和PES評(píng)分差異明顯（P

【關(guān)鍵詞】拔牙位點(diǎn)保存技術(shù)；口腔種植修復(fù)；PES評(píng)分；不良事件發(fā)生率

Efficacy and safety of tooth extraction site preservation techniques in dental implant repair

LIANG Liwen

School Hospital of Zibo normal tertiary school， Zibo， Shandong 255100， China

【Abstract】Objective To discuss the treatment modality of dental implant repair.Methods：Ninety consecutive patients undergoing dental implant repair in our hospital between June 2020 and June 2021 were selected，they wereequallydividedinto 45 cases in each group based on the random number table method.Different treatment modalities were used in the two groups，and the clinical indexes，PESscores，and incidence of adverse events were compared between the two groups.Results：Before treatment，the differences in alveolar height，alveolar width and alveolar BMD between the two groups were not statistically significant（P>0.05），and after treatment，the differences in alveolar height，alveolar width andalveolar BMD between the two groups were significant（P0.05），after treatment，the amount of alveolar bone resorption and PES scores of the two groups were significantly different（P

【Key Words】Technique of tooth extraction site preservation； Dental implant repair； PES score； Adverse event rates

口腔種植修復(fù)屬于牙列缺失修復(fù)術(shù)的一種，可以有效保證患者口腔健康。（剩余3206字）