超聲引導(dǎo)下兩種類型導(dǎo)管置管引流治療胸腔積液的臨床分析

打開文本圖片集

【摘要】目的：探究超聲引導(dǎo)下兩種類型導(dǎo)管置管引流治療胸腔積液的臨床效果。方法：選取2022年4月—2023年4月我院收治的80例胸腔積液患者，采用隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為兩組，即觀察組（n=40）和對照組（n=40）。對照組放置中心靜脈導(dǎo)管引流，觀察組放置豬尾導(dǎo)管進(jìn)行引流。比較兩組治療效果。結(jié)果：觀察組胸腔積液治療總有效率高于對照組（P0.05）；觀察組引流管放置時(shí)間、總引流量以及住院時(shí)間明顯優(yōu)于對照組（P

【關(guān)鍵詞】超聲引導(dǎo)；兩種類型；導(dǎo)管置管引流；胸腔積液

Clinical analysis of two types of catheterization and drainage under ultrasound guidance for the treatment of pleural effusion

CHEN Mingwen， YU Runqian

Meitan County People’s Hospital， Guizhou， Zunyi， Guizhou 564100， China

【Abstract】Objective：To explore the clinical effects of two types of catheterization and drainage under ultrasound guidance in the treatment of pleural effusion.Methods：80 patients with pleural effusion admitted to our hospital from April 2022 to April 2023 were selected and randomly divided into two groups using a random number table method，namely the observation group （n=40） and the control group（n=40）.The control group was placed with a central venous catheter for drainage，while the observation group placed a pigtail catheter for drainage.The therapeutic effects between the two groups were compared.Results：The total effective rate of treatment for pleural effusion in the observation group was higher than that in the control group （P0.05）；The placement time，total drainage volume，and hospitalization time of the observation group were significantly better than those of the control group （P

【Key Words】Ultrasound guidance； Two types； Catheter placement and drainage； Pleural effusion

就正常人而言，其胸腔內(nèi)部的少量積液可以發(fā)揮潤滑的效果[1]。（剩余4511字）