改良舟狀與傳統(tǒng)術(shù)口治療跟骨骨折的對比分析

打開文本圖片集

【摘 要】目的：比較分析跟骨骨折患者手術(shù)治療中，改良舟狀術(shù)口與傳統(tǒng)術(shù)口治療跟骨骨折的應用價值。方法：自2018年1月至2021年8月選擇80例跟骨骨折患者，分為兩組，40例術(shù)中采用傳統(tǒng)L形切口（對照組），40例術(shù)中采用舟狀改良切口（觀察組），對比兩組運用效果。結(jié)果：觀察組切口長度較對照組短，手術(shù)出血量較對照組少，手術(shù)后皮膚感染明顯較對照組少，手術(shù)與住院時間較對照組短，手術(shù)效果優(yōu)良率高于對照組（P

【關(guān)鍵詞】跟骨骨折；改良舟狀術(shù)口；傳統(tǒng)術(shù)口；并發(fā)癥

Comparative analysis of improved boat shape and traditional surgical opening treatment for heel bone fracture

YANG Shiying， LIU Bo， ZHAO Yinghua， LU Gang YinjiangLiubo Hospital， Tongren Guizhou 555200， China

【Abstract】Objective： To compare the application value of improved boatsurgeryand traditional surgeryin the surgical treatment of patients with heel bone fracture.Methods： From January 2018 to August 2021， 80 patients with calcaneal fractures were selected and divided into two groups. 40 cases used traditional L-shaped incisions during the operation （control group） and 40 cases used modified scaphoid incisions during the operation （observation group） ， Comparing the effects of the two groups .Results： The incision length of the observation group was shorter than that of the control group， and the amount of surgical bleeding was less than that of the control group，the postoperative skin infection was obviously less than that of the control group after the operation，the operation and hospitalization time were shorter than that of the control group，and the excellent and good rate of the operation effect was higher than that of the control group（P

【Key？Words】Heel fracture； Improved boat surgery； Traditional surgery； Complications

骨科中跟骨骨折問題并不少見，高墜傷、交通事故撞擊碾壓等情況下較多發(fā)，在全身骨折問題中，其發(fā)生率約占2%，在所有跗骨骨折中，其發(fā)生率約占60%[1]。（剩余3077字）