創(chuàng)造性判斷中改進(jìn)動機(jī)與結(jié)合啟示的考量

打開文本圖片集

摘 要：本研究選取機(jī)械領(lǐng)域發(fā)明專利實質(zhì)審查階段的三個實務(wù)案例，探討了發(fā)明創(chuàng)造性判斷過程中最接近現(xiàn)有技術(shù)的改進(jìn)動機(jī)對結(jié)合本領(lǐng)域公知常識的影響和對其他對比文件結(jié)合啟示的影響，以及其他對比文件具有相反教導(dǎo)時結(jié)合啟示的考量。對發(fā)明專利實質(zhì)審查程序中，創(chuàng)造性的“三步法”的應(yīng)用具有一定的參考意義。

關(guān)鍵詞：創(chuàng)造性；三步法；改進(jìn)動機(jī)；結(jié)合啟示

中圖分類號：G306     文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)志碼：A     文章編號：1003-5168（2022）20-0133-05

DOI：10.19968/j.cnki.hnkj.1003-5168.2022.20.029

Considerations of Improvement Motivation and Combination Revelation in Inventive Step

JIANG Ping    LYU Wenquan

（Patent Examination Cooperation Sichuan Center of the Patent Office， CNIPA， Chengdu 610213， China）

Abstract： This study selects three practical cases in the substantive examination stage of invention patents in the mechanical field， discussed the influence of the closest prior art's improvement motivation in the judging process of inventive step on the combination of common knowledge in the art， and the influence of the improvement motivation of the closest prior art on the combine revelation of other cited documents， and considerations of incorporation of revelation when other citeddocuments have contrary teachings. It has certain reference significance for the "three-step method" of Inventive Step in the substantive examination procedure of patents.

Keywords： inventive step;  three-step method;  improvement motivation; combination revelation

0 引言

對于發(fā)明專利申請，創(chuàng)造性地審查貫穿了發(fā)明專利的行政審批階段（實質(zhì)性審查階段）、行政復(fù)議階段（復(fù)審及無效審理階段）以及司法訴訟階段。（剩余4972字）