注冊(cè)帳號(hào)丨忘記密碼?
1.點(diǎn)擊網(wǎng)站首頁(yè)右上角的“充值”按鈕可以為您的帳號(hào)充值
2.可選擇不同檔位的充值金額,充值后按篇按本計(jì)費(fèi)
3.充值成功后即可購(gòu)買(mǎi)網(wǎng)站上的任意文章或雜志的電子版
4.購(gòu)買(mǎi)后文章、雜志可在個(gè)人中心的訂閱/零買(mǎi)找到
5.登陸后可閱讀免費(fèi)專(zhuān)區(qū)的精彩內(nèi)容
I’ve been on ChatGPT a lot lately and—apparently—I’m not the only one. I’m not actually using it (though I intend to); I’m there to gawk over1 what it can do—and, spoiler2, it goes well beyond3 producing first-year term papers. At a recent social gathering, one of my colleagues demonstrated that—if given a fictional research question—the generative artificial intelligence behind ChatGPT can write nearly flawless computer code for a certain syntax-based statistical package commonly used among policy-researcher types, like myself. It was humbling4; I’ve spent years learning to write such code, to middling5 ability. As you might imagine, this demonstration led to some inevitable—and now ubiquitous6—hand-wringing7 about automation and the implications for society.
最近我一直在搗鼓ChatGPT,顯然這么干的人不止我一個(gè)。(剩余8309字)
登錄龍?jiān)雌诳W(wǎng)
購(gòu)買(mǎi)文章
How Will AI Affect CTE?人工智能如何影響職業(yè)技術(shù)教育?
文章價(jià)格:5.00元
當(dāng)前余額:100.00
閱讀
您目前是文章會(huì)員,閱讀數(shù)共:0篇
剩余閱讀數(shù):0篇
閱讀有效期:0001-1-1 0:00:00
違法和不良信息舉報(bào)電話:400-106-1235
舉報(bào)郵箱:[email protected]