磁共振技術(shù)與CT在膝關(guān)節(jié)損傷診斷中的應(yīng)用對(duì)比研究

打開(kāi)文本圖片集

【摘要】目的：探析膝關(guān)節(jié)損傷診斷中采用磁共振技術(shù)與CT技術(shù)效果比較。方法：此次研究定于2022年1月—2023年2月開(kāi)展，在本院收治的膝關(guān)節(jié)損傷患者中選取80例配合研究，對(duì)所有患者均采用CT、磁共振技術(shù)診斷，比較兩種方法各類型檢出率及檢查時(shí)間。結(jié)果：MRI技術(shù)診斷顯示，關(guān)節(jié)腔積液56例（70.00%）、半月板變性58例（72.50%）、髕上囊32例（40.00%）、前后交叉韌帶損傷35例（43.75%）、骨髓水腫類型46例（57.50%）；MRI技術(shù)對(duì)各類型的檢出率高于CT技術(shù)（P

【關(guān)鍵詞】磁共振技術(shù)；膝關(guān)節(jié)損傷；CT；診斷對(duì)比

A comparative study of the application of magnetic resonance technology and CT in the diagnosis of knee injury

LU Jian

Kunshan Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine， Kunshan， Jiangsu 215300， China

【Abstract】Objective： To compare the effects of magnetic resonance technology and CT technology in the diagnosis of knee injury. Methods： This study is scheduled to be carried out from January 2022 to February 2023， 80 patients with knee joint injury admitted to our hospital were selected to cooperate with the study， and all patients were diagnosed by CT and magnetic resonance technology， and the detection rate and examination time of each type of the two methods were compared. Results： MRI technology showed that there were 56 cases （70.00%） of joint effusion， 58 cases （72.50%） of meniscal degeneration， 32 cases （40.00%） of suprapatellar capsule， 35 cases （43.75%） of anterior and posterior cruciate ligament injury， and 46 cases （57.50%） of bone marrow edema. The detection rate of MRI technology for each type was higher than that of CT technology（P

【Key Words】Magnetic resonance technology； Knee injuries； CT； Diagnostic comparison

臨床多種疾病中膝關(guān)節(jié)損傷常見(jiàn)，主要因高強(qiáng)度運(yùn)動(dòng)致病，因現(xiàn)今建筑業(yè)、交通業(yè)快速發(fā)展，膝關(guān)節(jié)損傷發(fā)生率逐年遞增。（剩余4441字）