急診護理干預(yù)對心肺復(fù)蘇后患者康復(fù)效果的影響分析

打開文本圖片集

【摘要】目的：分析對心肺復(fù)蘇患者施以急診護理干預(yù)對康復(fù)效果的影響。方法：分析對象選擇2020年6月—2022年6月就診于我院的心肺復(fù)蘇患者68例，隨機抽簽法施以分組觀察，34例施以常規(guī)護理的患者分入對照組，34例施以急診護理干預(yù)的患者分入研究組，對比和分析護理和康復(fù)效果。結(jié)果：與對照組（29.41%）比較，不良事件發(fā)生率研究組（5.88%）明顯較低（P0.05）；與對照組（9.15±3.26）分、（1.43±0.22）分比較，康復(fù)效果（GCS、NIHSS）護理后研究組（6.30±2.40）分、（0.21±0.06）分明顯較好（P

【關(guān)鍵詞】心肺復(fù)蘇；急診護理干預(yù)；康復(fù)效果

Analysis of the effect of emergency nursing intervention on the rehabilitation of patients after cardiopulmonary resuscitation

YUN Chaoling

The Third People’s Hospital of Baiyin， Gansu Province， Baiyin， Gansu 730700， China

【Abstract】Objective： To analyze the effect of emergency nursing intervention on the rehabilitation of patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Methods： A total of 68 patients with cardiopulmonary resuscitation who visited our hospital from June， 2020.6 to June， 2022.6 were randomly divided into groups for observation， 34 patients with routine nursing were divided into the control group， 34 patients with emergency nursing intervention were divided into the study group， and the nursing and rehabilitation effects were compared and analyzed. Results： Compared with the control group （29.41%）， the incidence of adverse events in the study group （5.88%） was significantly lower（P0.05）. Compared with the control group （9.15±3.26） and （1.43±0.22）， the rehabilitation effect （GCS， NIHSS） nursing group （6.30±2.40） and （0.21±0.06） were significantly better（P

【Key Words】Cardiopulmonary resuscitation； Emergency nursing intervention； Effect of rehabilitation

在急診中心肺復(fù)蘇為一種常用急救手段，主要應(yīng)對心臟停搏患者的救治，心臟停搏主要是指心臟無重大打擊、功能正常情況下心臟突然停搏導(dǎo)致機體缺氧、缺血情況[1]。（剩余4232字）