強(qiáng)脈沖光脫毛的臨床療效

打開(kāi)文本圖片集

[摘 要]目的 觀(guān)察強(qiáng)脈沖光脫毛的臨床療效。方法 選取南京華韓奇致美容醫(yī)院2022年1月-2023年12月收治的82例擬接受脫毛治療的患者為研究對(duì)象，采用隨機(jī)數(shù)字表法分為對(duì)照組與觀(guān)察組，各41例。對(duì)照組采用半導(dǎo)體激光脫毛，觀(guān)察組采用強(qiáng)脈沖光脫毛，比較兩組臨床療效、生活質(zhì)量及不良反應(yīng)發(fā)生情況。結(jié)果 觀(guān)察組治療總有效率為97.56%，高于對(duì)照組的78.05%，差異有統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)意義（P

[關(guān)鍵詞] 脫毛；強(qiáng)脈沖光；半導(dǎo)體激光

[中圖分類(lèi)號(hào)] R454.2 [文獻(xiàn)標(biāo)識(shí)碼] A [文章編號(hào)] 1004-4949（2024）14-0065-04

Clinical Efficacy of Intensive Pulsed Light Hair Removal

WANG Hao-wei

（Dermatology Department of Nanjing Huahanqi Beauty Hospital， Nanjing 210000， Jiangsu， China）

[Abstract]Objective To observe the clinical effect of intensive pulsed light hair removal. Methods A total of 82 patients who were going to receive hair removal treatment in Nanjing Huahanqi Beauty Hospital from January 2022 to December 2023 were selected as the research objects. They were divided into control group and observation group by random number table method， with 41 patients in each group. The control group was treated with semiconductor laser hair removal， and the observation group was treated with intensive pulsed light hair removal. The clinical efficacy， quality of life and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. Results The total effective rate of treatment in the observation group was 97.56%， which was higher than 78.05% in the control group， and the difference was statistically significant （P

[Key words] Hair removal； Intensive pulsed light； Semiconductor laser

隨著社會(huì)經(jīng)濟(jì)飛速發(fā)展，人們對(duì)美容需求不斷增加，過(guò)多的體毛成為很多愛(ài)美人士的一大困擾，傳統(tǒng)的脫毛方法包括刮毛法、蠟脫毛法、機(jī)械脫毛法、熱分解法、電分解法等，但存在維持時(shí)間短、疼痛程度高等問(wèn)題。（剩余5574字）