醫(yī)院提供者視角下過(guò)渡期護(hù)理協(xié)調(diào)性量表的漢化及信效度檢驗(yàn)

打開文本圖片集

基金項(xiàng)目 2020年度河南省高等學(xué)校青年骨干教師培養(yǎng)計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目，編號(hào)：2020GGJS001;河南省教育廳2022年大學(xué)生創(chuàng)新創(chuàng)業(yè)訓(xùn)練計(jì)劃項(xiàng)目，編號(hào)：202210459039

作者簡(jiǎn)介 張智霖，本科

通訊作者 劉臘梅，E?mail：[email protected]

引用信息 張智霖，劉臘梅，齊晶晶.醫(yī)院提供者視角下過(guò)渡期護(hù)理協(xié)調(diào)性量表的漢化及信效度檢驗(yàn)[J].護(hù)理研究，2023，37（23）：4194?4198.

Chinese version of Coordination of Transitional Care Survey and its reliability and validity test

ZHANG Zhilin， LIU Lamei， QI Jingjing

School of Nursing and Health， Zhengzhou University， Henan 450000 China

Corresponding Author  LIU Lamei， E?mail： [email protected]

Abstract  Objective：To translate Coordination of Transitional Care Survey（CTCS） into Chinese，and to test its reliability and validity.Methods：According to the Brislin translation model，the Chinese version of CTCS was formed by translation，integration，back?translation，expert advisory and pre?survey.The reliability and validity of Chinese version of CTCS were tested by means of questionaire among 222 hospital providers involved in the coordination of transitional care services in 3 tertiary grade A hospitals in Zhengzhou.Results：The Chinese version of the CTCS included 4 dimensions and 23 items.The overall Cronbach's α coefficient was 0.924，and the Cronbach's α coefficients of each dimension ranged from 0.777 to 0.954. The retest reliability was 0.878.The scale?content validity index（S?CVI） was 0.925.Exploratory factor analysis extracted 4 common factors，and the cumulative contribution rate of variance was 70.320%.Conclusions：The Chinese version of the CTCS had good reliability and validity，and which could be used as a tool to assess the quality of transitional care.

Keywords  transitional care； nursing management； scale； reliability； validity

摘要  目的：對(duì)醫(yī)院提供者視角下過(guò)渡期護(hù)理協(xié)調(diào)性量表（CTCS）進(jìn)行漢化，并進(jìn)行信效度檢驗(yàn)。（剩余10411字）